WithMe Travel

Group travel planning without the coordination chaos—start immediately, decide together, split expenses naturally.

UX DesignReactSupabaseReal-time CollaborationGroup DynamicsTravel Tech
WithMe Travel App Screenshot

The Problem

Anyone who's planned a group trip knows the chaos. Eight friends scattered across WhatsApp threads, competing Google Docs, and that one person who never responds until departure day. I watched friends abandon vacation ideas because coordinating schedules, preferences, and money across different apps was exhausting.

Traditional travel tools treat group planning like individual planning with more people—a fundamental flaw. Most apps optimize for personal productivity instead of group dynamics. When I started building WithMe.travel, I wasn't just solving a market opportunity. I was fixing a problem that had personally frustrated me for years.

The Real Problem Was Much Deeper

The more I dug into why group travel planning sucks, the more I realized this wasn't just about having too many apps. The issues were fundamental to how groups work together—and I had data to prove it.

Context Switching Is Killing Us

I started with Sophie Leroy's research on something called "attention residue"—basically, when you switch tasks, part of your brain stays stuck on the previous thing. It takes 25+ minutes to fully refocus after switching between apps.

For group trips, this means every jump from WhatsApp to Google Docs to Airbnb creates compound delays. Workers now switch between 9 apps daily, and 45% say it makes them less productive. When I watched friends plan trips, I could literally see this happening—the constant "wait, where did we put that restaurant list again?"

Groups Have Terrible Dynamics

Here's what blew my mind: Anita Woolley's research showed that group performance has nothing to do with how smart individual members are. Instead, it's all about equal turn-taking in conversations. Groups where a few people dominate perform significantly worse.

Every group trip has that one person who becomes the "organizer" by default. They end up doing 80% of the planning work while everyone else checks out. This isn't just annoying—it's scientifically proven to make worse decisions. Current tools actually encourage this by requiring someone to "own" the master document or group chat.

Money Conversations Happen Too Late

Expense-sharing platform research consistently shows financial discussions happen after emotional investment in destinations. By the time groups realize their dream Airbnb costs $300/night, they're stuck. More than one in three people planning summer vacation in 2024 considered taking on debt to cover costs.

I realized money anxiety kills group trips before they start, but people avoid budget conversations because they're awkward. The tools I used forced you to plan first, budget later—completely backwards.

Participation Barriers Are Real

This one surprised me: research shows that requiring account creation before value demonstration leads to massive drop-offs in group formation. People need to experience collaborative value before committing to yet another platform.

When I started mapping user journeys, I found that 80% of Millennials and Gen Z like travel planning apps, but 39% search on mobile then book on desktop. They have sophisticated expectations but low tolerance for friction.

The Multi-Platform Reality

American Express 2023 data confirmed what I suspected: travelers use multiple touchpoints throughout their journey. Even tech-savvy users download specific travel apps but still prefer human agents for complex bookings.

This created my core design challenge: How do you provide the convenience users expect while managing the complexity they're trying to avoid?

Design Implications

This research validated that WithMe wasn't just solving tool fragmentation—I was addressing fundamental challenges in group collaboration patterns, cognitive load management, and equitable participation.

The solution required:

  • Cognitive architecture that minimizes context switching
  • Social dynamics design that distributes engagement naturally
  • Progressive disclosure allowing value before commitment
  • Financial transparency integrated into destination selection
  • Inclusive participation regardless of planning experience

This transformed WithMe from a "nice-to-have" convenience tool into a solution for documented, measurable problems affecting millions of travelers annually.

Sources

Context Switching & Productivity:

  • Leroy, S. (2009). Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Asana Research Team. (2022). Context switching is killing your productivity. Work Life by Atlassian
  • TechSmith Survey. (2023). Meet context switching, the #1 productivity killer in the workplace

Group Dynamics & Collective Intelligence:

  • Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science
  • National Research Council. (2013). New directions in assessing performance potential of individuals and groups. The National Academies Press

Travel Industry Data:

  • American Express Travel. (2023). Global travel trends report
  • Bankrate. (2024). Summer travel survey: Debt and vacation planning
  • Splitwise user research and travel expense coordination studies

UX Research & Platform Adoption:

  • Various UX Collective and design platform research on onboarding friction and group formation barriers

The Approach

I designed for group dynamics from day one, not individual efficiency. Three core principles guided every decision:

Real-Time Feels Natural

When planning with friends, you should feel like you're in the same room. I built instant reactions, live presence indicators, and collaborative voting that mirrors natural conversation.

Progressive Engagement

I created a guest system that lets people explore and contribute before creating accounts. Friends can start planning immediately using secure shareable links, removing the biggest barrier to group formation.

Contextual Integration

Instead of treating expenses as separate workflow, I embedded cost discussions naturally into planning. Budget ranges get set during destination selection, and expenses track automatically as decisions are made.

The technical foundation used Supabase for real-time collaboration, React for responsive components, and a custom guest token system for frictionless onboarding. But the technology served the social experience, not the other way around.

The Outcome

Building WithMe taught me that designing for groups requires fundamentally different thinking than individual productivity tools. Every design choice had to consider social dynamics, not just functional efficiency.

Social Features Must Be Architectural

Group collaboration can't be retrofitted. It needs to be foundational to every component and interaction pattern.

Context Switching Kills Momentum

Fragmented workflows break the social energy that makes group planning enjoyable. Integration beats best-of-breed tools for collaborative experiences.

Design for Cohesion Over Efficiency

The best solution wasn't the fastest—it was the one that made groups feel most connected and confident about their decisions.

Reflection

This project reinforced that great product design isn't about removing all friction. It's about making the right frictions feel effortless while preserving the human messiness that makes experiences meaningful.

The WithMe approach to group travel planning demonstrated that when you design for social dynamics first, you can create experiences that feel both more efficient and more human. By focusing on the relationships between travelers rather than just the logistics, we created a platform that made planning part of the journey, not just a prerequisite to it.